Torqeedo Deep Blue 50 (50kW) vs Mercury 75hp (3-Cyl 2-Stroke)
Deep Blue 50 (50kW)
75hp (3-Cyl 2-Stroke)
| Spec | Torqeedo Deep Blue 50 (50kW) | Mercury 75hp (3-Cyl 2-Stroke) |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 80 HP | 75 HP |
| Displacement | 0 cc | 1165 cc |
| Configuration | 0 Cyl / V8 Equivalent | 3 Cyl / Inline |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 139 kg (306 lbs) | 131 kg (289 lbs) ← |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 1.9 | 2.33:1 |
| Alternator | 0 W | 113 W |
| Fuel Delivery | Direct Electric Drive | Carbureted |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | N/A (Electric) | NGK BUHW-2 |
| Engine Oil | N/A (Electric) | TC-W3 2-Stroke |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Torqeedo Deep Blue 50 (50kW) and Mercury 75hp (3-Cyl 2-Stroke) shows a displacement difference of 1165cc. The Mercury features a larger 1165cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Mercury is the lighter option at 131kg, offering a weight saving of 8kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Mercury offers the best charging performance with a 113W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 0-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.