Torqeedo Cruise 12.0 (Electric) vs Mercury 25hp EFI (3-Cyl)
Cruise 12.0 (Electric)
25hp EFI (3-Cyl)
| Spec | Torqeedo Cruise 12.0 (Electric) | Mercury 25hp EFI (3-Cyl) |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 25 HP | 25 HP |
| Displacement | 0 cc | 526 cc |
| Configuration | 0 Cyl / Electric | 3 Cyl / Inline |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 59.8 kg (132 lbs) ← | 78 kg (172 lbs) |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 1.0 | 1.92:1 |
| Alternator | 1010 W ← | 210 W |
| Fuel Delivery | External 48V Battery | EFI |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | N/A (Electric) | NGK DCPR6E |
| Engine Oil | N/A (Electric) | 10W-30 FC-W |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Torqeedo Cruise 12.0 (Electric) and Mercury 25hp EFI (3-Cyl) shows a displacement difference of 526cc. The Mercury features a larger 526cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Torqeedo is the lighter option at 59.8kg, offering a weight saving of 18.200000000000003kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Torqeedo offers the best charging performance with a 1010W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 0-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.