Tohatsu MFS30 EFI (3-Cyl) vs Hidea HD30F (2-Stroke)
MFS30 EFI (3-Cyl)
HD30F (2-Stroke)
| Spec | Tohatsu MFS30 EFI (3-Cyl) | Hidea HD30F (2-Stroke) |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 30 HP | 30 HP |
| Displacement | 500 cc ← | 496 cc |
| Configuration | 3 Cyl / Inline | 2 Cyl / Inline-2 |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 62 kg (137 lbs) | 53 kg (117 lbs) ← |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 2.17:1 | 2.08 |
| Alternator | 210 W ← | 80 W |
| Fuel Delivery | EFI | Carbureted |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | NGK DCPR6E | NGK BR7HS |
| Engine Oil | 10W-30 FC-W | TC-W3 (50:1) |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Tohatsu MFS30 EFI (3-Cyl) and Hidea HD30F (2-Stroke) shows a displacement difference of 4cc. The Tohatsu features a larger 500cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Hidea is the lighter option at 53kg, offering a weight saving of 9kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Tohatsu offers the best charging performance with a 210W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 4-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.