Tohatsu MFS25 EFI (3-Cyl) vs Mercury 25hp EFI (3-Cyl)
MFS25 EFI (3-Cyl)
25hp EFI (3-Cyl)
| Spec | Tohatsu MFS25 EFI (3-Cyl) | Mercury 25hp EFI (3-Cyl) |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 25 HP | 25 HP |
| Displacement | 500 cc | 526 cc ← |
| Configuration | 3 Cyl / Inline | 3 Cyl / Inline |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 58 kg (128 lbs) ← | 78 kg (172 lbs) |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 2.17:1 | 1.92:1 |
| Alternator | 210 W | 210 W |
| Fuel Delivery | EFI | EFI |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | NGK DCPR6E | NGK DCPR6E |
| Engine Oil | 10W-30 FC-W | 10W-30 FC-W |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Tohatsu MFS25 EFI (3-Cyl) and Mercury 25hp EFI (3-Cyl) shows a displacement difference of 26cc. The Mercury features a larger 526cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Tohatsu is the lighter option at 58kg, offering a weight saving of 20kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Mercury offers the best charging performance with a 210W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 4-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.