Scott-Atwater 10hp Bail-a-Matic vs Parsun F9.8 (4-Stroke)
10hp Bail-a-Matic
F9.8 (4-Stroke)
| Spec | Scott-Atwater 10hp Bail-a-Matic | Parsun F9.8 (4-Stroke) |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 10 HP | 9.8 HP |
| Displacement | 269 cc ← | 209 cc |
| Configuration | 2 Cyl / Inline-2 | 2 Cyl / Inline |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 29 kg (64 lbs) ← | 38 kg (84 lbs) |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 1.60:1 | 2.08 |
| Alternator | 0 W | 84 W |
| Fuel Delivery | Carbureted | Carbureted |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | Champion J6C | NGK DCPR6E |
| Engine Oil | SAE 30 or TC-W3 | Parsun 4-Stroke Oil |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Scott-Atwater 10hp Bail-a-Matic and Parsun F9.8 (4-Stroke) shows a displacement difference of 60cc. The Scott-Atwater features a larger 269cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Scott-Atwater is the lighter option at 29kg, offering a weight saving of 9kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Parsun offers the best charging performance with a 84W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 2-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.