Oxe OXE150 Diesel vs Johnson 135hp Crossflow V4
OXE150 Diesel
135hp Crossflow V4
| Spec | Oxe OXE150 Diesel | Johnson 135hp Crossflow V4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 150 HP | 135 HP |
| Displacement | 2000 cc ← | 1600 cc |
| Configuration | 4 Cyl / Inline-4 | 4 Cyl / V4 90° |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 350 kg (772 lbs) | 142 kg (313 lbs) ← |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 1.73 | 1.86 |
| Alternator | 1872 W ← | 126 W |
| Fuel Delivery | Common Rail Direct Injection | Twin Carbureted |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | None (Diesel) | Champion QL77JC4 |
| Engine Oil | 5W-30 Synthetic Diesel | TC-W3 2-Stroke |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Oxe OXE150 Diesel and Johnson 135hp Crossflow V4 shows a displacement difference of 400cc. The Oxe features a larger 2000cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Johnson is the lighter option at 142kg, offering a weight saving of 208kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Oxe offers the best charging performance with a 1872W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 4-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.