Mercury 85hp (Inline-4) vs Torqeedo Deep Blue 50 (50kW)
85hp (Inline-4)
Deep Blue 50 (50kW)
| Spec | Mercury 85hp (Inline-4) | Torqeedo Deep Blue 50 (50kW) |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 85 HP | 80 HP |
| Displacement | 1090 cc | 0 cc |
| Configuration | 4 Cyl / Inline | 0 Cyl / V8 Equivalent |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 95 kg (209 lbs) ← | 139 kg (306 lbs) |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Alternator | 201 W | 0 W |
| Fuel Delivery | Carbureted | Direct Electric Drive |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | NGK BUHW (Surface Gap) | N/A (Electric) |
| Engine Oil | TC-W3 2-Stroke | N/A (Electric) |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Mercury 85hp (Inline-4) and Torqeedo Deep Blue 50 (50kW) shows a displacement difference of 1090cc. The Mercury features a larger 1090cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Mercury is the lighter option at 95kg, offering a weight saving of 44kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Mercury offers the best charging performance with a 201W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 2-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.