Mercury 115hp EFI (1.7L) vs Evinrude 110hp Crossflow V4
115hp EFI (1.7L)
110hp Crossflow V4
| Spec | Mercury 115hp EFI (1.7L) | Evinrude 110hp Crossflow V4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 115 HP | 110 HP |
| Displacement | 1741 cc ← | 1632 cc |
| Configuration | 4 Cyl / Inline | 4 Cyl / V4 90° |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 175 kg (386 lbs) | 138 kg (304 lbs) ← |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 2.33:1 | 2.00:1 |
| Alternator | 630 W ← | 126 W |
| Fuel Delivery | EFI | Twin Carbureted |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | NGK LFR4A-E | Champion QL77JC4 |
| Engine Oil | 25W-40 FC-W | TC-W3 2-Stroke |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Mercury 115hp EFI (1.7L) and Evinrude 110hp Crossflow V4 shows a displacement difference of 109cc. The Mercury features a larger 1741cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Evinrude is the lighter option at 138kg, offering a weight saving of 37kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Mercury offers the best charging performance with a 630W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 4-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.