Mercury 115hp EFI (1.7L) vs Chrysler 105hp (2-Stroke)
115hp EFI (1.7L)
105hp (2-Stroke)
| Spec | Mercury 115hp EFI (1.7L) | Chrysler 105hp (2-Stroke) |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 115 HP | 105 HP |
| Displacement | 1741 cc ← | 1582 cc |
| Configuration | 4 Cyl / Inline | 4 Cyl / Inline |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 175 kg (386 lbs) | 113 kg (249 lbs) ← |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 2.33:1 | 1.73:1 |
| Alternator | 630 W ← | 120 W |
| Fuel Delivery | EFI | Carbureted |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | NGK LFR4A-E | Champion L4J |
| Engine Oil | 25W-40 FC-W | TC-W3 (50:1) |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Mercury 115hp EFI (1.7L) and Chrysler 105hp (2-Stroke) shows a displacement difference of 159cc. The Mercury features a larger 1741cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Chrysler is the lighter option at 113kg, offering a weight saving of 62kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Mercury offers the best charging performance with a 630W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 4-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.