Mercury 115 Command Thrust vs Evinrude 110hp Crossflow V4
115 Command Thrust
110hp Crossflow V4
| Spec | Mercury 115 Command Thrust | Evinrude 110hp Crossflow V4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 115 HP | 110 HP |
| Displacement | 2100 cc ← | 1632 cc |
| Configuration | 4 Cyl / Inline | 4 Cyl / V4 90° |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 165 kg (364 lbs) | 138 kg (304 lbs) ← |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 2.38:1 | 2.00:1 |
| Alternator | 441 W ← | 126 W |
| Fuel Delivery | Multi-Port EFI | Twin Carbureted |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | NGK LFR6A-11 | Champion QL77JC4 |
| Engine Oil | Mercury FourStroke Oil 10W-30 | TC-W3 2-Stroke |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Mercury 115 Command Thrust and Evinrude 110hp Crossflow V4 shows a displacement difference of 468cc. The Mercury features a larger 2100cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Evinrude is the lighter option at 138kg, offering a weight saving of 27kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Mercury offers the best charging performance with a 441W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 4-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.