Mariner 60hp BigFoot (2-Stroke) vs Chrysler 55hp (2-Stroke)
60hp BigFoot (2-Stroke)
55hp (2-Stroke)
| Spec | Mariner 60hp BigFoot (2-Stroke) | Chrysler 55hp (2-Stroke) |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 60 HP | 55 HP |
| Displacement | 967 cc ← | 732 cc |
| Configuration | 3 Cyl / Inline | 2 Cyl / Inline |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 109 kg (240 lbs) | 71 kg (157 lbs) ← |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 2.33:1 | 2.00:1 |
| Alternator | 216 W ← | 60 W |
| Fuel Delivery | Carbureted | Carbureted |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | NGK BP8H-N-10 | Champion L77JC4 |
| Engine Oil | TC-W3 (50:1) | TC-W3 2-Stroke |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Mariner 60hp BigFoot (2-Stroke) and Chrysler 55hp (2-Stroke) shows a displacement difference of 235cc. The Mariner features a larger 967cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Chrysler is the lighter option at 71kg, offering a weight saving of 38kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Mariner offers the best charging performance with a 216W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 2-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.