Mariner 115hp (2-Stroke) vs Chrysler 105hp (2-Stroke)
115hp (2-Stroke)
105hp (2-Stroke)
| Spec | Mariner 115hp (2-Stroke) | Chrysler 105hp (2-Stroke) |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 115 HP | 105 HP |
| Displacement | 1848 cc ← | 1582 cc |
| Configuration | 4 Cyl / Inline | 4 Cyl / Inline |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 158 kg (348 lbs) | 113 kg (249 lbs) ← |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 2.07:1 | 1.73:1 |
| Alternator | 192 W ← | 120 W |
| Fuel Delivery | Carbureted | Carbureted |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | NGK BPZ8HS-10 | Champion L4J |
| Engine Oil | 50:1 Pre-mix | TC-W3 (50:1) |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Mariner 115hp (2-Stroke) and Chrysler 105hp (2-Stroke) shows a displacement difference of 266cc. The Mariner features a larger 1848cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Chrysler is the lighter option at 113kg, offering a weight saving of 45kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Mariner offers the best charging performance with a 192W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 2-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.