Johnson 135hp Crossflow V4 vs Oxe OXE125 Diesel
135hp Crossflow V4
OXE125 Diesel
| Spec | Johnson 135hp Crossflow V4 | Oxe OXE125 Diesel |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 135 HP | 125 HP |
| Displacement | 1600 cc | 2000 cc ← |
| Configuration | 4 Cyl / V4 90° | 4 Cyl / Inline-4 |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 142 kg (313 lbs) ← | 350 kg (772 lbs) |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 1.86 | 1.73 |
| Alternator | 126 W | 1872 W ← |
| Fuel Delivery | Twin Carbureted | Common Rail Direct Injection |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | Champion QL77JC4 | None (Diesel) |
| Engine Oil | TC-W3 2-Stroke | 5W-30 Synthetic Diesel |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Johnson 135hp Crossflow V4 and Oxe OXE125 Diesel shows a displacement difference of 400cc. The Oxe features a larger 2000cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Johnson is the lighter option at 142kg, offering a weight saving of 208kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Oxe offers the best charging performance with a 1872W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 2-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.