Chrysler 150hp (2-Stroke) vs Johnson 135hp Crossflow V4
150hp (2-Stroke)
135hp Crossflow V4
| Spec | Chrysler 150hp (2-Stroke) | Johnson 135hp Crossflow V4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 150 HP | 135 HP |
| Displacement | 1622 cc ← | 1600 cc |
| Configuration | 4 Cyl / Inline | 4 Cyl / V4 90° |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 118 kg (260 lbs) ← | 142 kg (313 lbs) |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 2.0 | 1.86 |
| Alternator | 113 W | 126 W ← |
| Fuel Delivery | Carbureted | Twin Carbureted |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | Champion QL77JC4 | Champion QL77JC4 |
| Engine Oil | TC-W3 2-Stroke | TC-W3 2-Stroke |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Chrysler 150hp (2-Stroke) and Johnson 135hp Crossflow V4 shows a displacement difference of 22cc. The Chrysler features a larger 1622cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Chrysler is the lighter option at 118kg, offering a weight saving of 24kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Johnson offers the best charging performance with a 126W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 2-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.