Chrysler 135hp (2-Stroke) vs Oxe OXE125 Diesel
135hp (2-Stroke)
OXE125 Diesel
| Spec | Chrysler 135hp (2-Stroke) | Oxe OXE125 Diesel |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Performance | ||
| Horsepower | 135 HP | 125 HP |
| Displacement | 1586 cc | 2000 cc ← |
| Configuration | 4 Cyl / Inline | 4 Cyl / Inline-4 |
| Weights & Dimensions | ||
| Dry Weight | 115 kg (254 lbs) ← | 350 kg (772 lbs) |
| Mechanical & Electrical | ||
| Gear Ratio | 2.00:1 | 1.73 |
| Alternator | 192 W | 1872 W ← |
| Fuel Delivery | Carbureted | Common Rail Direct Injection |
| Maintenance | ||
| Spark Plug | Champion UL18V | None (Diesel) |
| Engine Oil | TC-W3 2-Stroke | 5W-30 Synthetic Diesel |
Technical Comparison Analysis
Power & Displacement
Comparing the Chrysler 135hp (2-Stroke) and Oxe OXE125 Diesel shows a displacement difference of 414cc. The Oxe features a larger 2000cc block, which typically provides superior low-end torque and better hole-shot performance when pushing heavy loads or reaching planning speeds.
Weight & Rigging
In terms of transom weight, the Chrysler is the lighter option at 115kg, offering a weight saving of 235kg over its competitor. This weight reduction is critical for smaller hulls or boats with limited transom capacity where every kilogram affects the center of gravity and drainage efficiency.
Electrical & Features
For boats equipped with modern electronics, sonar, and shallow-water anchors, the Oxe offers the best charging performance with a 1872W alternator. Choosing the right power-to-weight profile between these two 2-stroke engines depends heavily on your specific boat's displacement and daily power requirements.